norm referenced testing : vs others
criterion referenced testing : vs standards
domain referenced
alternate approach
potentially disruptive
==Client discussion==
looking for signficant differences
interested in numbers — more efficient
==What to evaluate?==
signficant differences (but we expect it will be hard to get)
look also at
satisfaction
confidence
“We have cured times tables.” — what’s the malady?
Wasatch 9th E
8am at school library
May 18
9am mtg in class
==Computer lab from 2:30 – 3:15==
==Library lab from 1:30 – 3:15==
split Marie’s class
===Procedure: Data Collection & Observation===
Pretest (to be administered by teacher?)
* Nametags
Lab startup
Physical observations
Sketch environment, details on people, work stations
Interview questions (as students leave)
Posttest (to be administered by teacher?)
IPT 661 Notes: 5-13-2010
norm referenced testing : vs others
criterion referenced testing : vs standards
domain referenced
alternate approach
potentially disruptive
==Client discussion==
looking for signficant differences
interested in numbers — more efficient
==What to evaluate?==
signficant differences (but we expect it will be hard to get)
look also at
satisfaction
confidence
“We have cured times tables.” — what’s the malady?
Wasatch 9th E
8am at school library
May 18
9am mtg in class
==Computer lab from 2:30 – 3:15==
==Library lab from 1:30 – 3:15==
split Marie’s class
===Preparation====
Instruments, scripts, student lists, nametags(?), software installation, pretests
===Procedure: Data Collection & Observation===
Pretest (to be administered by teacher?)
* Nametags
Lab startup
Physical observations
Sketch environment, details on people, work stations
Interview questions (as students leave)
Posttest (to be administered by teacher?)