IPT 661 Notes: 5-13-2010

norm referenced testing : vs others
criterion referenced testing : vs standards
domain referenced

alternate approach
potentially disruptive

==Client discussion==
looking for signficant differences
interested in numbers — more efficient

==What to evaluate?==
signficant differences (but we expect it will be hard to get)
look also at
satisfaction
confidence
“We have cured times tables.” — what’s the malady?

Wasatch 9th E
8am at school library

May 18
9am mtg in class
==Computer lab from 2:30 – 3:15==
==Library lab from 1:30 – 3:15==
split Marie’s class

===Preparation====
Instruments, scripts, student lists, nametags(?), software installation, pretests

===Procedure: Data Collection & Observation===
Pretest (to be administered by teacher?)
* Nametags
Lab startup
Physical observations
Sketch environment, details on people, work stations
Interview questions (as students leave)
Posttest (to be administered by teacher?)

This entry was posted in IPT 661 - Evaluation and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Subscribe without commenting