IPT 682 Notes: 9-29-2009

Intermittent and digressive class notes on setting up hooks and anticipation in proposals, from David Wiley’s IPT 682 course.

large ship must point small helm into wind to
look smaller than you are
cynical
tactic – one must take the path of least resistance to survive the storm?
eye of the tiger

small helm is the question, succinct and digestable; large ship is the big ideas, the arguments and premises that follow

listening to songs, predicting next note

anxious to go skating despite strained ankle

The research question of your study is the “last note” of your introduction.
Should build, move toward a question inevitably

Little Shop of Horrors works for me because it devours itself, it’s an anti-musical

believable
relevant, important, pertinent
timing, pacing
bait the hook
tension
urgency
dire implication
passion

funnel: start broad, get narrow
(like Dante’s Inferno, it opens to another world on the other side, inverse cone)

Peter and the Wolf
retelling with a heart

what happens during pre-service

teacher quality –> student achievement

Special Ed instruction is poor ?

identifying factors that influence quality in pre-service teacher reading

knowledge skills and dispositions

without research we don’t know what they believe

if we don’t know what they think we don’t know how that affects practice

what are the beliefs?

WHy is it so important that we understand this?

hooks are the fun part, drilling down to the question is cool

This entry was posted in IPT 682 - Project Management, PhD Coursework and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Subscribe without commenting