<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions re. solitude and learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learn.5tein.com/2009/09/15/ipt682-02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learn.5tein.com/2009/09/15/ipt682-02/</link>
	<description>Jared Stein&#039;s grad-school-community blog on teaching and learning.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jaredstein</title>
		<link>http://learn.5tein.com/2009/09/15/ipt682-02/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>jaredstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn.5tein.com/?p=6#comment-7</guid>
		<description>@David
I think its a challenging question, but also that the semantics matter in this distinction. We can say that literacy allows us to talk to dead people (as Gardner reminds us)--is that the same as talking to people? I&#039;m inclined to answer that solitude requires lack of interactivity with living people, rather than use synchronicity as the distinguishing factor. I suspect there are a myriad of factors that originate from the social that can affect intellectual and creative pursuits that are absent in solitude (e.g. peer pressure, scrutiny, digressions, politeness).

But I do have to now wonder if there is a difference in solitary experiences that are connected to programmed data networks (e.g. Google, Wikipedia), vs disconnected, period. I suppose one could relate it to wandering a library, but there is an addictive quality to clicking hyperlinks that may not be comparable.

Who would fund it? Maybe no one. Perhaps the NEA -- not the National Education Association, mind you, but the National Endowment for the Arts? Any organization that is invested in studying the psychology of creativity, perhaps. I&#039;ll have to consider this further...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David<br />
I think its a challenging question, but also that the semantics matter in this distinction. We can say that literacy allows us to talk to dead people (as Gardner reminds us)&#8211;is that the same as talking to people? I&#8217;m inclined to answer that solitude requires lack of interactivity with living people, rather than use synchronicity as the distinguishing factor. I suspect there are a myriad of factors that originate from the social that can affect intellectual and creative pursuits that are absent in solitude (e.g. peer pressure, scrutiny, digressions, politeness).</p>
<p>But I do have to now wonder if there is a difference in solitary experiences that are connected to programmed data networks (e.g. Google, Wikipedia), vs disconnected, period. I suppose one could relate it to wandering a library, but there is an addictive quality to clicking hyperlinks that may not be comparable.</p>
<p>Who would fund it? Maybe no one. Perhaps the NEA &#8212; not the National Education Association, mind you, but the National Endowment for the Arts? Any organization that is invested in studying the psychology of creativity, perhaps. I&#8217;ll have to consider this further&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wiley</title>
		<link>http://learn.5tein.com/2009/09/15/ipt682-02/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wiley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn.5tein.com/?p=6#comment-6</guid>
		<description>&quot;...is a form of disconnecting from others, not from information.&quot; Since information sources come to us &quot;asynchronously&quot; from other people, does solitude imply a disconnection from synchronicity, not from people?

The idea of the cycle of async / sync seems really interesting.

If this exercise has given you more to chew on, then it&#039;s been successful. Now see where the shower, dishes, and lawn mowing take you. As for who would fund, what sounds like a &quot;higher risk&quot; study than someone who brazenly rejects the conventional wisdom about the messianic role of always-on social media in learning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;is a form of disconnecting from others, not from information.&#8221; Since information sources come to us &#8220;asynchronously&#8221; from other people, does solitude imply a disconnection from synchronicity, not from people?</p>
<p>The idea of the cycle of async / sync seems really interesting.</p>
<p>If this exercise has given you more to chew on, then it&#8217;s been successful. Now see where the shower, dishes, and lawn mowing take you. As for who would fund, what sounds like a &#8220;higher risk&#8221; study than someone who brazenly rejects the conventional wisdom about the messianic role of always-on social media in learning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaredstein</title>
		<link>http://learn.5tein.com/2009/09/15/ipt682-02/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>jaredstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learn.5tein.com/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>More questions and clarifications:
(Define &quot;informal&quot;.)
How important is members&#039; solitary work for (individual &#124; collective) success of self-forming online learning communities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More questions and clarifications:<br />
(Define &#8220;informal&#8221;.)<br />
How important is members&#8217; solitary work for (individual | collective) success of self-forming online learning communities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

